Boat licencing and regs in Victoria
Posted: 07 Dec 2011, 08:44
I read with interest (amazement!) in today's Weekly Times that the Victorian government plans to introduce 80 odd new regs into recreational boating.
A few things that jumped out were:
* to obtain a boat licence, you will be up for about $643 to cover the mandatory training course that you will be required to pass. That's just to operate a boat (but it's OK, the actual licence fee will remain at about $30).
* if you want to tow a skier or tube, you'll have do another mandatory course that will set you back another $538!
* if you fail to wear a life jacket, the fine will jump from the current $195 to the new $611. Compare that to failing to wear a seatbelt in a car, which is $165.
Of course, you can challenge any of these if you do get a fine, but it will cost you $2443 in court costs.
On top of all this, local councils will be allowed to impose the fines and it seems keep the money. I bet that will make money starved councils tell their officers to be super diligent in finding faults, particularly if councils are pocketing the fines, which it seems.
As always, the joke is with the claims of the data used for justification. A couple of examples used being were a body-boarder being swept out to sea and having scuba and snorkelling accidents included in the data as it was not known if boats were used in the activity.
I'm all for safety, but this is nothing but a blatant money grab.
Greg
A few things that jumped out were:
* to obtain a boat licence, you will be up for about $643 to cover the mandatory training course that you will be required to pass. That's just to operate a boat (but it's OK, the actual licence fee will remain at about $30).
* if you want to tow a skier or tube, you'll have do another mandatory course that will set you back another $538!
* if you fail to wear a life jacket, the fine will jump from the current $195 to the new $611. Compare that to failing to wear a seatbelt in a car, which is $165.
Of course, you can challenge any of these if you do get a fine, but it will cost you $2443 in court costs.
On top of all this, local councils will be allowed to impose the fines and it seems keep the money. I bet that will make money starved councils tell their officers to be super diligent in finding faults, particularly if councils are pocketing the fines, which it seems.
As always, the joke is with the claims of the data used for justification. A couple of examples used being were a body-boarder being swept out to sea and having scuba and snorkelling accidents included in the data as it was not known if boats were used in the activity.
I'm all for safety, but this is nothing but a blatant money grab.
Greg